<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Marketing Operations on Bootstrapping.org</title>
    <link>https://bootstrapping.org/tags/marketing-operations/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Marketing Operations on Bootstrapping.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://bootstrapping.org/tags/marketing-operations/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Who Owns Event Budget: The Field Marketing Versus Demand Gen Turf Fight</title>
      <link>https://bootstrapping.org/who-owns-event-budget-the-field-marketing-versus-demand-gen-turf-fight/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://bootstrapping.org/who-owns-event-budget-the-field-marketing-versus-demand-gen-turf-fight/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ask five marketing teams who owns the events line and you&amp;rsquo;ll get five answers, all of them delivered with total confidence and none of them the same. The argument sounds like a budget argument. It&amp;rsquo;s really an argument about which question the event is supposed to answer, and whoever wins gets to pick the scoreboard.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;two-teams-two-theories-of-the-same-room&#34;&gt;Two teams, two theories of the same room&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Demand gen looks at a conference and sees a channel. Spend goes in, leads come out, you divide one by the other and compare the result to paid search. It&amp;rsquo;s a coherent way to think and it has the enormous advantage of being legible to a CFO.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
