<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Social Media on Bootstrapping.org</title>
    <link>https://bootstrapping.org/tags/social-media/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Social Media on Bootstrapping.org</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://bootstrapping.org/tags/social-media/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Building in Public: Free Distribution or Expensive Distraction?</title>
      <link>https://bootstrapping.org/2026/04/08/building-in-public-free-distribution-or-expensive-distraction/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://bootstrapping.org/2026/04/08/building-in-public-free-distribution-or-expensive-distraction/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Building in public has become a genre unto itself — a content format and a community and an aesthetic simultaneously. The visible iteration, the revenue screenshots, the honest postmortem, the monthly recap with the chart going up and to the right: these are now recognizable templates that a substantial audience has formed around and a substantial number of founders have adopted as their primary distribution strategy. Whether it works depends almost entirely on a question most people don&amp;rsquo;t ask before they start.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
